FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Sacha bashing

Sacha bashing

Started by Mozart44 REPLIES279 VIEWS· 24 Aug 2026, 04:49
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
Mozart
MozartCoach50,394 posts
24 Aug 2026, 04:49
#1
24 Aug 2026, 04:49#1

There has been a building negative view on Sacha, to the extent that some of these so called rugby experts, handing out their biased player ratings, have him at a 4. Well watching the game again I see a couple of dangerous gain line runs, a few brilliant high ball takes one where he was in the clear with zero support, a try saving corner flagging tackle on Jordan (the reason he got there is he could anticipate what was going to happen and put on the after burners), some great touchline kicks….and a yes some mistakes.

There was one dropped ball when Allende passed into his head from 5 yards away, maybe a few other handling errors, and clearly not great coordination in the backline. Part of the reason for that is he was trying to force the issue….throwing the pass to put the receiver through the gap. The kind of passes NZ was throwing that were routinely caught…..because the players were anticipating them.

I agree Williams and Sacha is perhaps not the best combination. Ideally he would be playing with a very steady scrumhalf that could help him with decision making and take some of the pressure off. The trouble is that steady Eddie is Reinach, ever a hesitant clearer from the ruck and no tactician. I can’t figure out why Faf was deep sixed for this guy.

The kid is a match winner, trying to play cutting edge rugby in a team that has the most basic backline tactics of any top team….a bit of a fish out of water, but the player who could change Bok rugby. And already a player who has made test winning contributions. We need a real backline coach, Brown has done nothing, whether he can’t or isn’t allowed to, is unclear. We are no different to 2019, that was just another myth. Sacha would benefit hugely from better overall backline coaching. Hell, whoever is coaching the Japanese backline is miles ahead of us.

The most concerning thing is goal kicking. Sure Cheslin did a great job on Saturday but he is injured and 32 years old. Jalibert also doesn’t kick, Ramos does….but I don’t see our Ramos. My guess is we will see Manie before the series is over. But he is no pressure kicker either and the most feeble tackler in the squad. Sacha has fabulous range, but less than optimal consistency. It would be interesting to see some test career stats on that to gauge the extent of the problem.

I can easily see some kind of bench role evolving for Sacha, that would be such a retrogressive step, but it’s on the cards. Hopefully we won’t waste him at fullback or put him at 12 off the bench.

Pakie
Captain18,091 posts
Pakie24 Aug 2026, 05:25

He is brilliant individually, but no one plays off him in the Bok setup. In a French side he would have been a better Jalibert - the skills plus more physicality, he'd create havoc in those setups. Hell, the Aussies would probably kill for him - imagine a sharp guy like Lennie Ikitau next to him with Sua outside, what he could do with the space of a deeper, more nuanced attack. All these sides, from Aus to Japan to Scotland to the ABs, who has specifically stated they want to get back to traditional AB rugby under Rennie, are pushing an expansive, multi-layered game. I love the Boks, but for the love of god we're a hard side to watch with the way we play by not playing.

Plum
Captain21,801 posts
Plum24 Aug 2026, 09:24

@Pakie nobody plays off of him because DDA physically can't keep up and our wingers are always too far back because they're expecting to have to time runs past his line at full tilt when he kicks for the millionth time.

And then we complain when perhaps twice in a game he tries to take it one himself.

bobbok
bobbokCaptain10,480 posts
24 Aug 2026, 07:05
#2
24 Aug 2026, 07:05#2

Good summaries ... Brown ball smells

KI
kingcornPro3,828 posts
24 Aug 2026, 08:40
#3
24 Aug 2026, 08:40#3

Talented player, that is for sure. Frustrating when you see a player not talking to his inside our outside backs, that playes on instinct and talent alone. Where did we see this before?

As a 10 you need to be vocal, you need to think 10 steps ahead. I don't see this. This nonsense of heads up rugby and play what you see.

Then look at the last 10 years how Ireland went from mid to top. Who was in the driving seat. Sexton, I hate this guy's, big mouth, massive attitude, but the Irish backline worked. The forwards knew what they were doing and so on.

You can't excuse his talent and then not blame him. He is not ready, he had a break out season last year and now he has the 2nd year hump. He was awful all year with flashes of brilliance.

That is him.

Rassie is doing him no favours either in not having a decent 9. Bring back Faf, drop Reinach and put Williams in the wider squad and let van den berg develop a partnership with Sasha. Simples.

But too many moving parts, players can never get used to each other

MO
moolaaPro2,425 posts
24 Aug 2026, 08:41
#4
24 Aug 2026, 08:41#4

Sorry guys but from the other side I think Sacha is way overrated. Reminds me of a headless chook the way he played on Saturday. Hell if he can’t organise his backline with all the front foot ball the Boks had in the first half with the ABs in full reverse mode, he certainly wasn’t going to get any better once our forwards gained parity in the second half!
Pollard back I would think. May not be exciting but has a far cooler head in tight situations.

KI
Pro3,828 posts
kingcorn24 Aug 2026, 06:57

Thanks Moola, and from somebody who has seen there fair share if the most talented 10 to ever play the game.

Carter was amazing and probably still the best.

Then you had Carlos Spencer which every SA fan drooled over.

Even when you had a boring player like Mertens, he was still a match winner. Not flashy, but help the All Blacks dominate.

It also helped the all blacks probably had some of the best 9s to go with it and these players would often come as a combo package.

The fact that they don't have Papier or Pollard starting is mind boggling

Plum
PlumCaptain21,801 posts
24 Aug 2026, 09:41
#5
24 Aug 2026, 09:41#5

Help me understand how you guys come to your conclusions?

Let's start by how often Sacha got the ball. Then how many times he kicked and how many times he passed.

He is under instruction kick basically everything.

How are you meant to organise a backline, spark plays, and be a team guy when you have to kick every single ball that comes to you?

I'd love to know what communication you guys are talking about. There are basically three things that happen 99% of the time with the Boks...

The ball goes from 9 to pod...bash. 9 gets the ball and box kicks...everybody has to chase. Sacha gets the ball and is under instructions to kick it.

What communication is required from Sacha beyond what is easily discernible?

But here's a question for you boys, since you claim he's not ready. What is Sacha's win percentage starting at 10 for the Boks.

The answer might surprise you. And it doesn't line up with the narrative that he's not ready. The problem isn't the player, it's the moronic gameplan. The same game plan that lost us the chance to break Eden Park.

If, on Saturday, we again fail to use our backline, I honestly hope the ABs put an ever bigger score on us.

But KC, honestly, for any player of colour to make your grade, is almost impossible. I mean, you don't even rate Willemse and think he's apparently also too erratic.

SA
Captain30,878 posts
Saffolk 24 Aug 2026, 07:47

King is clueless - literally

sharkbok
Captain23,328 posts
sharkbok25 Aug 2026, 22:51

Sasha looks to make a break, or spread the ball wide, and what does he see? Dumbian and Kriel who lack the creativity to create a paper aeroplane.

We need to find some better centers. I prefer Esterhuizen, but ideally we have a play maker.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,878 posts
24 Aug 2026, 09:45
#6
24 Aug 2026, 09:45#6

Spot on Moz - Sacha is the most gifted player in the game and needs to be cherished not ignorantly disregarded

Moola you are clueless

SA
Captain30,878 posts
Saffolk 25 Aug 2026, 16:52

@moolaa does that now define his career you idiot? Him being benched? Are you really this stupid?

MO
Pro2,425 posts
moolaa25 Aug 2026, 19:44

@Saffolk Well your great saviour coach has lost faith in him! Ask yourself!

Plum
PlumCaptain21,801 posts
24 Aug 2026, 11:00
#7
24 Aug 2026, 11:00#7

"Brown has done nothing"

I only see a some remnants of his influence occasionally when our forwards offload.

MP
MpowerPro5,161 posts
24 Aug 2026, 11:02
#8
24 Aug 2026, 11:02#8

Some of you are defending Sacha like he's already the finished product. Make no mistake, Sacha is very talented but talent alone doesn't win you Test matches.

You can't squeeze a player ready. He has to become ready on his own, and the way he played on Saturday showed he's not completely there yet.

Sacha mostly tries to beat the opposition team on his own, and he does that also by the Stormers. He doesn't create and distribute for his fellow backline players. Be honest, do you see him controlling the game at the Stormers week in and week out?

He doesn't have a cool head in pressure situations yet. He needs to be managed properly, not thrown in and expected to just be "super."

I don't believe Rassie instructed him to play like that. If he did, then Rassie is a massive fool and it shows that Rassie is actually clueless. I think it's more likely that Sacha was in over his head.

The better option right now is for him to play of the bench and Pollard starts. Pollard needs to teach him, guide him, and take the pressure off.

This way he can hone his skills, and learn how to control a game.

DbDraad
Captain26,868 posts
DbDraad24 Aug 2026, 14:02

Good post M, I agree...in short, he tries too hard and wants to do it all on his own...he should just curb his enthusiasm a wee bit...wait for it to come naturally instead of trying to force a miracle every time he touches the ball.

Plum
PlumCaptain21,801 posts
24 Aug 2026, 11:16
#9
24 Aug 2026, 11:16#9

I agree with King on Sexton though.

Ag, just in general I wish the Bok backs could score the types of tries the Irish do.

DE
DennyCaptain13,114 posts
24 Aug 2026, 11:32
#10
24 Aug 2026, 11:32#10

Someone said the Aussies would love to have a player like Sacha. He’d fit right into the Australian setup, with his game flourishing alongside teammates who share his mindset. Instead, he’s stuck in a rut with two pretend centres and a game plan that constantly falls back on kicking.
I honestly don't believe there's a coach in the country who can coach Sascha.

KI
Pro3,828 posts
kingcorn24 Aug 2026, 10:28

Deny, you may have a point, but even at the Stormers his backs struggle to figure what he is trying to do. Manie managed the Stormers backline way better. The stormers have some of the best attacks in the comp, but often their own worse enemy and it became evidently worse when Sasha was playing for them at 10.

image

This is his season stats, you can't tell me this is a player on top of his game

link text

DbDraad
DbDraadCaptain26,868 posts
24 Aug 2026, 16:06
#11
24 Aug 2026, 16:06#11

The irony of Moz opinioning on player bashing...LOL

Mozart
Coach50,394 posts
Mozart24 Aug 2026, 14:31

Nice catch Draad….I love the smell of irony in the morning

DbDraad
Captain26,868 posts
DbDraad24 Aug 2026, 15:22

@Mozart ... it's your opinion...and you back it up with facts...I don't have to agree with it, or like it ...my disagreement is with some of your views and not with you as person...I tend to come across as snide at times... it's not intentional...I will work on it.

Mozart
Coach50,394 posts
Mozart24 Aug 2026, 15:26

@DbDraad …..just kidding Draad…I get the irony

Rooinek
RooinekCaptain18,684 posts
24 Aug 2026, 19:12
#12
24 Aug 2026, 19:12#12

I've been watching rugby for about 55 years. Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu is the most talented player I've ever seen.

Those of you who want to write him off after a few disappointing performances, go right ahead . . . he's going to apply liberal amounts of egg to your faces.

I have a problem with the game plan he's expected to play and I won't deny he's made a few errors in his last few games, especially his kicking out of hand . . . but this guy has the goods. If you can't see that then the problem is with you, not with him.

If I had the choice right now for the next test between Dan Carter at his best and SFM as he is right now, I'd pick Sacha in a heartbeat.

PS I also think a lot of players would have their confidence knocked if they made a few errors and got relegated to the bench but I think Sacha knows how good he is . . . and not in an arrogant way. He's still going to be a Springbok legend. This is just a speed wobble.

DbDraad
Captain26,868 posts
DbDraad25 Aug 2026, 03:04

Rooi, I don't think anyone is writing him off, but he didn't have his best match on Saturday...most Bokke performed below par...he is still very young and have already achieved a lot in a short time... he'll learn and become even better... I'm expecting him to hit back hard when he comes on on Saturday...the Bokke will be focused and will have a point to prove regardless of the wet conditions.

SA
Captain30,878 posts
Saffolk 25 Aug 2026, 09:39

Spot on Rooi - agreed - most gifted player I have ever seen

MO
Pro2,425 posts
moolaa25 Aug 2026, 19:45

@SaffolkYawn…..

KI
kingcornPro3,828 posts
25 Aug 2026, 12:19
#13
25 Aug 2026, 12:19#13

I would just say we need to stop hyping up young players. I remember Johan Goosen being the next best thing, 12 test matches as a 21 year old and then he made a series if really bad choices. He got to 30, came back and showed glimpses of his brilliance but could never perform consistently, always injured.

Sasha biggest hurdles will he his ego and injuries.

If you look at the two greatest flyhalf in modern rugby. Wilkonson and Carter. I'll probably have to throw in Sexton no matter how much I hate this guy.

They all went through the same. The former being very humble. Yet, they all knew how to bring the best out of their backs. Johny became one of the greatest kicking 10s, where he use to be really physical, same as Sasha, Sasha even more so. Carter was just everyone target because he was so dangerous. But all 3 had an impeccable kicking game.

All Sasha offer right now is his running capabilities, can't find his backs, holds onto the ball way too long and never set up any play.

His kicking is bloody awful, yes he can land a few long range kicks but they are not controlled. Kicking the ball out on the full, to deep on his restart, cross field kicks are missed time, his runs are over done. That was this Saturday against the Kiwis, a scrum on the half way line !!!

So where is the talent? You are looking at the wrong traits. Sexy video highlight reals, cutting line, catching his own kicks, running into space, some flashy dummy and so on. Oh, he is so talented. Best 10s are the ones that don't always stand out but can step up. It would be different if Dud or Kriel knocked the ball on, forward passing, notting setup on their runs and so on. But I didn't even see these guys. Just Sasha running between them.

The guy is 25 already. His had 15 test, 3 full seasons of first class rugby with 1600 min under his belt this season alone.

Yet, the whole team implodes around him. Did you not look at his Stormers stats?

Talent is one thing, flashy talent, massive "houding'. Afrikaans for attitude

If he can pull it together and actually work on the fundamentals and looked at what the 3 I mentioned great he'll go a long way. But I don't see any of those qualities in him

Deus Ex Lemur
Pro2,404 posts
Deus Ex Lemur26 Aug 2026, 12:21

@Plum He looks like a better Quade Cooper from those clips. Certainly more Cooper-esque than Carter. Good awareness and decent skills. I'd like to see a little less hang time on some of those longer passes

Plum
Captain21,801 posts
Plum26 Aug 2026, 12:36

@Deus Ex Lemur Also, lighting quick. I think Williams might be the only one in the squad faster than he is...and only marginally so.

DE
DennyCaptain13,114 posts
26 Aug 2026, 06:15
#14
26 Aug 2026, 06:15#14

Sacha is 24, relatively inexperienced, and competing at the highest level of rugby.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,328 posts
26 Aug 2026, 14:24
#15
26 Aug 2026, 14:24#15

When Libok got onto the field, he tried to get the backline running. However, we had the same problem as Sasha. His centres don't know how to run lines to provide options on attack.

It also did not help that the Bok forwards started to implode in the 2nd half, with the bench making no impact.

SA
Captain30,878 posts
Saffolk 26 Aug 2026, 19:05

@Deus Ex Lemur what a load of utter rubbish

Deus Ex Lemur
Pro2,404 posts
Deus Ex Lemur26 Aug 2026, 22:08

@Saffolk The idea that New Zealand players have traditionally been trained to solve defensive pictures on the field is hardly controversial. It has been an explicit part of their coaching philosophy for years. Wayne Smith, for example, has taught attack through identifying what the defence is presenting, attacking the available space, and developing variations from an initial play according to how the defence responds. His decision-making material specifically starts with scouting the defensive picture, devising an initial play to exploit it, and then building alternative solutions from that play. Dan Carter has also described the information he looked for in a defence and how that determined the attacking decision.

Nor did this necessarily mean elaborate fifteen-man moves. New Zealand coaching material explicitly advocates "working in threes": breaking the game into small units in which a ball-carrier operates with two supporting players and therefore has multiple options. The support players learn to clean, take a short pass, take an early pass on another angle, change pace, pull defenders away or attack a hole or weak shoulder. The exercise begins with predetermined patterns to establish the technical relationships and then develops those relationships within opposed situations. The same NZ material applies the principle to backs, loose forwards, counterattack and phase play.

That is much closer to what I meant by a "repertoire of plays." Perhaps repertoire of small-unit solutions is the more accurate description. Players aren't simply told, "Run move X on phase four." They acquire combinations, running lines and options, then learn to recognise the relevant defensive cue and select between them. Smith's backline coaching follows the same principle: establish combinations such as 9–10, give the line rhythm and timing, and teach players what they should actually be looking for. His attacking material also integrates forwards into these structures rather than treating this purely as back play.

This was particularly relevant to the Henry/Hansen/Smith-era All Blacks. Smith's coaching philosophy repeatedly emphasised game sense and decision-making rather than merely rehearsing movements. He has subsequently explained that players should be given specific things to scan for rather than trying to process everything, and that once they sense the relevant picture they should back that recognition and make the call. He even relates this principle to Carter: Carter wanted the players outside him to identify the opportunity and give him the appropriate call so that he could execute the solution immediately.

My criticism of South African rugby isn't that no South African player has ever been taught decision-making. That would obviously be absurd. It is that our traditional development and Test rugby have generally placed much greater emphasis on physical dominance, territory, structure and executing assigned roles, whereas New Zealand placed unusual emphasis on developing these small-unit relationships and allowing players to solve problems collectively in real time. That difference becomes particularly visible when structure breaks down: the New Zealand player has historically been expected not merely to know his job in the system, but to read what the defenders around him are doing and choose an appropriate solution with the two or three players around him.

So if the objection is that New Zealand rugby never coached players in small groups to recognise defensive pictures and select from learned attacking options, then "utter nonsense" is a difficult description to sustain. New Zealand's own coaching resources describe exactly that methodology.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news